https://www.geolitho.eu/finanziell-unterstuetzen/https://edelsteintage-bremen.dehttps://www.mineral-bosse.de

Autor Thema: Claraite  (Gelesen 912 mal)

0 Mitglieder und 1 Gast betrachten dieses Thema.

Offline Lexikon

  • Neuer User ohne Beiträge
  • Beiträge: 0

Michael J Pabst

  • Gast
Claraite
« Antwort #1 am: 03 Sep 20, 22:08 »
The Crystal Diagram for Claraite does not appear to me to be Triclinic (it looks hexagonal).

Offline guefz

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Beiträge: 5.855
  • Just hanging around...
    • GüFz aus MYK
Re: Claraite
« Antwort #2 am: 04 Sep 20, 14:38 »
Yes, two angles in the crystal are close to 90° but the third is quite a bit off, so that should be visible in the drawing. When you switch on the axis, the hexagonal structure is clearly visible. Stefan should delete this drawing, it is directly in the database.

Offline Uwe Kolitsch

  • Sponsor 2025
  • *
  • Beiträge: 3.351
    • Uwe Kolitsch, NHM Wien
Re: Claraite
« Antwort #3 am: 04 Sep 20, 16:26 »
The mineral is pseudohexagonal.
For details see
Biagioni, C. & Orlandi, P. (2017): Claraite, (Cu,Zn)15(AsO4)2(CO3)4(SO4)(OH)14·7H2O: redefinition and crystal structure. European Journal of Mineralogy 29, 1031-1044.
https://arpi.unipi.it/retrieve/handle/11568/895507/280441/EJM-S-17-00042.pdf

Offline guefz

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Beiträge: 5.855
  • Just hanging around...
    • GüFz aus MYK
Re: Claraite
« Antwort #4 am: 04 Sep 20, 16:30 »
But then it should not have the three axis of the hexagonal system in the drawing when you switch axis on.

Dann müssten die Achsen aber anders eingezeichnet sein: statt a1,a2,a3,c müsste es a,b,c sein.
« Letzte Änderung: 04 Sep 20, 16:43 von guefz »

Offline Uwe Kolitsch

  • Sponsor 2025
  • *
  • Beiträge: 3.351
    • Uwe Kolitsch, NHM Wien
Re: Claraite
« Antwort #5 am: 04 Sep 20, 16:43 »
Yes. The drawing is an oversimplification of the true morphology. I agree it should be deleted.

 

Mineralienatlas - Fossilienatlas - Info-Center

Neueste Beiträge Neueste Beiträge