de en
 

Welcome guest

Login
Register
Imprint
Protection of privacy
Message
Our team
Help and how it works
https://fossilsworldwide.de/
https://www.mineraliengrosshandel.com
https://www.edelsteine-neuburg.de
https://crystalparadise.de/
https://edelsteintage-bremen.de
https://www.mineral-bosse.de
595 Gäste, 11 Mitglieder (2 Versteckte)
nwsachse, smoeller, oliverOliver, geomueller, felsenmammut, guefz, Sargentodoxa, Stronkolo, Dieter
Derzeit sind keine Benutzer im Chat
https://www.phillisverlag.de/Kalender-Shop/Mineralienkalender/
https://www.mineralbox.biz
https://www.lithomania.de
07. Feb. - 20. Marien­berg­er Min­er­alien­börse, DE
21. Feb. - 35.Min­er­alien­börse Flöha
21. Feb. - 16. Mit­tel­säch­sisch­er Min­er­alien- und Fos­silien­tr­eff, DE
01. Mar. - Min­er­alien­börse
01. Mar. - 18. In­tern. Mi­cro­moun­ter Tausch­tag in Rosen­heim/Ober­bay­ern
https://www.chiemgauer-mineralien-fossiliensammler.de/
https://www.juwelo.de
https://vfmg.de/der-aufschluss/
Deutschland/Sachsen/Bautzen, Landkreis/Ottendorf-Okrilla
 
Image of the day
Achat
© Hardy
https://www.phillisverlag.de/Kalender-Shop/Mineralienkalender/
https://www.mineralbox.biz
https://www.lithomania.de
07. Feb. - 20. Marien­berg­er Min­er­alien­börse, DE
21. Feb. - 35.Min­er­alien­börse Flöha
21. Feb. - 16. Mit­tel­säch­sisch­er Min­er­alien- und Fos­silien­tr­eff, DE
01. Mar. - Min­er­alien­börse
01. Mar. - 18. In­tern. Mi­cro­moun­ter Tausch­tag in Rosen­heim/Ober­bay­ern
Calender
https://www.chiemgauer-mineralien-fossiliensammler.de/
https://www.juwelo.de
https://vfmg.de/der-aufschluss/
 
 
 
Mineralienatlas (name for mineral atlas) is the platform for people interested in mineralogy, geology, palaeontology and mining since 2001. We operate a significant database for minerals, fossils, rocks and their localities. Mineralienatlas is not limited to a section. We bring together information and inform comprehensive.

To complete our information constantly, we need your support. With us, everyone can and should participate. Currently Mineralienatlas is used and expanded by 10455 members. Every month hundreds of thousands of visitors use our website as an information source.
 
Geolitho Foundation non-profit GmbH
Geolitho Foundation non-profit GmbH is the non-profit supporter of the Mineral Atlas (Mineralienatlas), the Lithotheque, the Geolitho Collection Management and the Marketplace and Store by collectors for collectors. The Foundation promotes public education in the field of mineralogy, geology, paleontology and mining by operating, maintaining and further expanding earth science projects.
 
https://www.mineral-bosse.de
https://www.edelsteine-neuburg.de
https://www.mineralbox.biz
https://www.mineraliengrosshandel.com
https://crystalparadise.de/
https://vfmg.de/der-aufschluss/
 
The Mu­nich Show 2025The Mineralientage München 2025 – The Munich Show once again showcased a fascinating variety of minerals, fossils, and jewelry. Although visitor numbers appeared slightly lower than last year, the fair remained vibrant and diverse. Highlights included the collector displays and the special exhibition on natural resources, while the fossil section was somewhat smaller.
Some visitors expressed a wish for more seating areas, opportunities for exchange, and more eye-catching advertising, yet overall the event left a very positive impression and remains a must-visit for collectors and families alike.
The Min­er­alien­t­age München 2025 – The Mu­nich Show once again show­cased a fas­ci­nat­ing va­ri­e­ty of min­er­als, fos­sils, and jew­el­ry. Al­though vis­i­tor num­bers ap­peared slight­ly low­er than last year, the fair re­mained vi­brant and di­verse. High­lights in­clud­ed the col­lec­tor dis­plays and the spe­cial ex­hi­bi­tio ... moreThe Mineralientage München 2025 – The Munich Show once again showcased a fascinating variety of minerals, fossils, and jewelry. Although visitor numbers appeared slightly lower than last year, the fair remained vibrant and diverse. Highlights included the collector displays and the special exhibition on natural resources, while the fossil section was somewhat smaller.
Some visitors expressed a wish for more seating areas, opportunities for exchange, and more eye-catching advertising, yet overall the event left a very positive impression and remains a must-visit for collectors and families alike.
appetizer image
Konkre­tio­nen und Knollen ... Konkretionen wurden in den vergangenen Jahrhunderten oft als geologische Kuriositäten betrachtet. Aufgrund der Vielzahl ungewöhnlicher Formen, Größen und Zusammensetzungen wurden sie als Dinosaurier-Eier, Tier- oder Pflanzenfossilien (sogen. Pseudofossilien), extraterrestrischer Abfall oder selbst als vom Menschen erzeugte Artefakte interpretiert. Obwohl für all diese Fehlinterpretationen heute nurmehr ein Lächeln übrigblieb, gibt es immer noch Falschbezeichnungen, resp. unterschiedliche Begriffsdefinitionen, selbst (oder meist) in der geo-wissenschaftlichen Literatur. So werden nicht selten Knollen als Konkretionen ... Ein Beitrag von Peter Seroka
... Konkre­tio­nen wur­den in den ver­gan­ge­nen Jahrhun­derten oft als ge­ol­o­gische Ku­riositäten be­trachtet. Auf­grund der Vielzahl ungewöhn­lich­er For­men, Größen und Zusam­menset­zun­gen wur­den sie als Di­nosau­ri­er-Ei­er, Ti­er- oder Pflanzen­fos­silien (so­gen. Pseud­o­fos­silien), ex­trater­re­strisch­er Ab­fall oder selb ... more... Konkretionen wurden in den vergangenen Jahrhunderten oft als geologische Kuriositäten betrachtet. Aufgrund der Vielzahl ungewöhnlicher Formen, Größen und Zusammensetzungen wurden sie als Dinosaurier-Eier, Tier- oder Pflanzenfossilien (sogen. Pseudofossilien), extraterrestrischer Abfall oder selbst als vom Menschen erzeugte Artefakte interpretiert. Obwohl für all diese Fehlinterpretationen heute nurmehr ein Lächeln übrigblieb, gibt es immer noch Falschbezeichnungen, resp. unterschiedliche Begriffsdefinitionen, selbst (oder meist) in der geo-wissenschaftlichen Literatur. So werden nicht selten Knollen als Konkretionen ... Ein Beitrag von Peter Seroka
appetizer image
In­di­ca­tor stoneA Scandinavian indicator stone is a glacial erratic composed of a characteristic rock type derived from a small known source area in Scandinavia. This term not only applies to igneous and metamorphic rocks but also to some sedimentary rocks. The Jotnian Sandstone and most of the Palaeozoic limestones, and the Old Red Sandstone are not included in the definition, although the presence of these and other rocks provide some evidence about the source area(s) of erratics and should certainly not be neglected in a stone count. In all cases we recommend including the whole assemblage of erratics/stones in such account. This makes it possible to use several methods of Interpretation. However, it should be pointed out that the practise used in the past, whereby each researcher had her/his own method of interpreting stone counts, has proved to be unsatisfactory. We demonstrate on the bases of over 2000 counts of indicator stones that we have carried out on assemblages mostly from Lower Saxony and Schleswig-Holstein, but also from other N.German states and neighbouring countries, that the TGZ method (LÜTTIG 1958) yields the most reliable results. In addition to this method, the sources of individual indicator stones may be plotted on a so-called circle map and can be integrated with possible source data and the relative frequencies of other erratics in the assemblage. Some rock types are more suitable as indicator stones then others. It is unwise to use clearly unsuitable rock types; this would considerably reduce the reliability of the method and lead to erroneous results.
A Scan­di­na­vian in­di­ca­tor stone is a gla­cial er­rat­ic com­posed of a char­ac­teris­tic rock type de­rived from a small known source area in Scan­di­navia. This term not on­ly ap­plies to ig­neous and me­ta­mor­ph­ic rocks but al­so to some sed­i­men­tary rocks. The Jot­nian Sand­s­tone and most of the Palaeo­zoic lime­s­tone ... moreA Scandinavian indicator stone is a glacial erratic composed of a characteristic rock type derived from a small known source area in Scandinavia. This term not only applies to igneous and metamorphic rocks but also to some sedimentary rocks. The Jotnian Sandstone and most of the Palaeozoic limestones, and the Old Red Sandstone are not included in the definition, although the presence of these and other rocks provide some evidence about the source area(s) of erratics and should certainly not be neglected in a stone count. In all cases we recommend including the whole assemblage of erratics/stones in such account. This makes it possible to use several methods of Interpretation. However, it should be pointed out that the practise used in the past, whereby each researcher had her/his own method of interpreting stone counts, has proved to be unsatisfactory. We demonstrate on the bases of over 2000 counts of indicator stones that we have carried out on assemblages mostly from Lower Saxony and Schleswig-Holstein, but also from other N.German states and neighbouring countries, that the TGZ method (LÜTTIG 1958) yields the most reliable results. In addition to this method, the sources of individual indicator stones may be plotted on a so-called circle map and can be integrated with possible source data and the relative frequencies of other erratics in the assemblage. Some rock types are more suitable as indicator stones then others. It is unwise to use clearly unsuitable rock types; this would considerably reduce the reliability of the method and lead to erroneous results.
appetizer image
Min­er­alien­por­trait Ti­tanitTitanit ist ein Mineral, welches man in Vorkommen unterschiedlicher Genese antrifft. In Granitpegmatiten können Kristalle bis 25 cm groß werden; in Alkaligesteinen bis zu 6 cm. Kristalle von erstklassiger Qualität (relativ auch Edelsteinqualität) findet man jedoch nur in alpinotypen Klüften. Erstmals gefunden wurde Titanit 1795 in den Hauzenberger Graphitgruben im Bayerischen Wald und beschrieben durch Martin Heinrich KLAPROTH, der das Mineral nach seinem Gehalt an Titan benannte. Soweit nachvollziehbar, führte KLAPROTH die Erz-Analysen im Auftrag eines Bergbauunternehmens durch.
Ti­tanit ist ein Min­er­al, welch­es man in Vorkom­men un­ter­schiedlich­er Ge­nese an­trifft. In Granit­peg­matiten kön­nen Kris­talle bis 25 cm groß wer­den; in Al­ka­ligestei­nen bis zu 6 cm. Kris­talle von er­stk­las­siger Qual­ität (rel­a­tiv auch Edel­stein­qual­ität) fin­d­et man je­doch nur in alpino­typen Klüften. Er­st­ma ... moreTitanit ist ein Mineral, welches man in Vorkommen unterschiedlicher Genese antrifft. In Granitpegmatiten können Kristalle bis 25 cm groß werden; in Alkaligesteinen bis zu 6 cm. Kristalle von erstklassiger Qualität (relativ auch Edelsteinqualität) findet man jedoch nur in alpinotypen Klüften. Erstmals gefunden wurde Titanit 1795 in den Hauzenberger Graphitgruben im Bayerischen Wald und beschrieben durch Martin Heinrich KLAPROTH, der das Mineral nach seinem Gehalt an Titan benannte. Soweit nachvollziehbar, führte KLAPROTH die Erz-Analysen im Auftrag eines Bergbauunternehmens durch.
appetizer image
Min­er­al por­trait ara­g­onite (ger­man)Aragonite is a calcium carbonate, chemically identical with calcite. The mineral calcite, however, differs from Aragonite due to its internal crystal structure. While the crystal system of calcite is trigonal, the system of aragonite is rhombic. Dense masses of small aragonite crystals are difficult to distinguish from calcite, but they are larger, they show a distinct habit.

A lot of chapters in this portrait will give you much more details about this interesting mineral. Written and investigated by Peter Seroka. (Article in german)
Ara­g­onite is a cal­ci­um car­bo­nate, chem­i­cal­ly iden­ti­cal with calcite. The min­er­al calcite, how­ev­er, dif­fers from Ara­g­onite due to its in­ter­nal crys­tal struc­ture. While the crys­tal sys­tem of calcite is trig­o­n­al, the sys­tem of ara­g­onite is rhom­bic. Dense mass­es of small ara­g­onite crys­tals are dif­fi­cul ... moreAragonite is a calcium carbonate, chemically identical with calcite. The mineral calcite, however, differs from Aragonite due to its internal crystal structure. While the crystal system of calcite is trigonal, the system of aragonite is rhombic. Dense masses of small aragonite crystals are difficult to distinguish from calcite, but they are larger, they show a distinct habit.

A lot of chapters in this portrait will give you much more details about this interesting mineral. Written and investigated by Peter Seroka. (Article in german)
appetizer image
Bro­ken Hill in Aus­tralienErste Expeditionen in die Barrier Ranges gab es 1844-46. Silbererz wurde auf dem Grundstück der Thackaringa Schafzucht gefunden. Patrick Green gründete die erste Mine "The Pioneer" 1876. 1883 fand Charles Rasp schwarzes Gestein und vermutete Kassiterit; also schickte er Proben zur Analyse. Darin waren Silber und Blei, aber nicht genug, um wirtschaftlich zu werden. Die Proben, manganhaltiges Eisenerz, stammten aus der Oxidationszone. Im Laufe des Jahres wurden mehr Proben entnommen, die Broken Hill zu einer großen Entdeckung machten.
Er­ste Ex­pe­di­tio­nen in die Bar­ri­er Ranges gab es 1844-46. Sil­ber­erz wurde auf dem Grund­stück der Thackarin­ga Schafzucht ge­fun­den. Pa­trick Green grün­dete die er­ste Mine "The Pi­oneer" 1876. 1883 fand Char­les Rasp sch­warzes Gestein und ver­mutete Kas­si­ter­it; al­so schickte er Proben zur Anal­yse. Darin war ... moreErste Expeditionen in die Barrier Ranges gab es 1844-46. Silbererz wurde auf dem Grundstück der Thackaringa Schafzucht gefunden. Patrick Green gründete die erste Mine "The Pioneer" 1876. 1883 fand Charles Rasp schwarzes Gestein und vermutete Kassiterit; also schickte er Proben zur Analyse. Darin waren Silber und Blei, aber nicht genug, um wirtschaftlich zu werden. Die Proben, manganhaltiges Eisenerz, stammten aus der Oxidationszone. Im Laufe des Jahres wurden mehr Proben entnommen, die Broken Hill zu einer großen Entdeckung machten.
appetizer image
Min­er­al por­trait gar­netThis portrait mainly deals with the 6 classic garnets, their amazing history, the world’s best known classic and modern localities and deposits and their use as a gems or abrasives. It also deals with the common belief related to the non-existence of blue garnets and its refutation proven by new finds. A separate chapter deals with synthetic garnets. But it also deals with the mix up of definitions, groupings and old and unnecessary terms, which have finally been terminated or brought to a common denominator.

In 2012 the IMA (CNMNC) has defined garnets as members of the Garnet Supergroup, which include all minerals isostructural with garnet regardless of what elements occupy the four atomic sites; i.e. the supergroup includes several chemical classes . Those minerals are closely related to each other and may form a series with each other. Some garnets form intermediary minerals between each member, and may even be intergrown within a single crystal.

With the publication of the new nomenclature of the garnet supergroup, the term “garnet group” does not have its meaning anymore and the intermediate working term “Garnet superstructural group” has been replaced by “Garnet Supergroup”.
There are 32 approved species and 5 “candidate” species waiting on approval. The 32 species are subdivided by their Z-charge into 29 species, which belong to 5 groups and to 3 single representative species.
One of those 5 groups is the “Garnet group”, consisting of the 6 former (classic) garnets Pyrope, Grossular, Spessartine, Almandine, Uvarovite and Andradite plus 8 rarer garnets , as Menzerite-(Y), Eringaite, Goldmanite, Momoiite, Knorringite, Calderite, Majorite and Morimotoite.
This por­trait main­ly deals with the 6 clas­sic gar­nets, their amaz­ing his­to­ry, the world’s best known clas­sic and mod­ern lo­cal­i­ties and de­posits and their use as a gems or abra­sives. It al­so deals with the com­mon be­lief re­lat­ed to the non-ex­is­tence of blue gar­nets and its refu­ta­tion proven by new ... moreThis portrait mainly deals with the 6 classic garnets, their amazing history, the world’s best known classic and modern localities and deposits and their use as a gems or abrasives. It also deals with the common belief related to the non-existence of blue garnets and its refutation proven by new finds. A separate chapter deals with synthetic garnets. But it also deals with the mix up of definitions, groupings and old and unnecessary terms, which have finally been terminated or brought to a common denominator.

In 2012 the IMA (CNMNC) has defined garnets as members of the Garnet Supergroup, which include all minerals isostructural with garnet regardless of what elements occupy the four atomic sites; i.e. the supergroup includes several chemical classes . Those minerals are closely related to each other and may form a series with each other. Some garnets form intermediary minerals between each member, and may even be intergrown within a single crystal.

With the publication of the new nomenclature of the garnet supergroup, the term “garnet group” does not have its meaning anymore and the intermediate working term “Garnet superstructural group” has been replaced by “Garnet Supergroup”.
There are 32 approved species and 5 “candidate” species waiting on approval. The 32 species are subdivided by their Z-charge into 29 species, which belong to 5 groups and to 3 single representative species.
One of those 5 groups is the “Garnet group”, consisting of the 6 former (classic) garnets Pyrope, Grossular, Spessartine, Almandine, Uvarovite and Andradite plus 8 rarer garnets , as Menzerite-(Y), Eringaite, Goldmanite, Momoiite, Knorringite, Calderite, Majorite and Morimotoite.
appetizer image
Tox­iz­ität von Min­er­alienIn der Natur finden sich einige anorganische Verbindungen, deren Gefährdungspotential von den Sammlern häufig unterschätzt wird. Zwar liegen die tödlichen Mengen, im Vergleich zu höhermolekularen organischen Giftstoffen deutlich höher, aber es besteht auch die Gefahr der Anreicherung eines Giftsoffes im Körper, wodurch verschiedene Krankheiten (z.B. Krebs) ausgelöst werden. Als akut toxisch ist beispielsweise .. Ein beitrag von Andreas Brand
In der Na­tur fin­d­en sich einige anor­ganische Verbin­dun­gen, deren Ge­fähr­dungspo­ten­tial von den Samm­lern häu­fig un­ter­schätzt wird. Zwar lie­gen die tödlichen Men­gen, im Ver­gleich zu höher­moleku­laren or­ganischen Gift­stof­fen deut­lich höher, aber es beste­ht auch die Ge­fahr der An­reicherung eines Gift­soffe ... moreIn der Natur finden sich einige anorganische Verbindungen, deren Gefährdungspotential von den Sammlern häufig unterschätzt wird. Zwar liegen die tödlichen Mengen, im Vergleich zu höhermolekularen organischen Giftstoffen deutlich höher, aber es besteht auch die Gefahr der Anreicherung eines Giftsoffes im Körper, wodurch verschiedene Krankheiten (z.B. Krebs) ausgelöst werden. Als akut toxisch ist beispielsweise .. Ein beitrag von Andreas Brand
appetizer image
 
https://www.juwelo.de
https://www.lithomania.de
https://edelsteintage-bremen.de
https://fossilsworldwide.de/
https://www.chiemgauer-mineralien-fossiliensammler.de/
https://www.phillisverlag.de/Kalender-Shop/Mineralienkalender/