Mineralienatlas (name for mineral atlas) is the platform for people interested in mineralogy, geology, palaeontology and mining since 2001. We operate a significant database for minerals, fossils, rocks and their localities. Mineralienatlas is not limited to a section. We bring together information and inform comprehensive.

To complete our information constantly, we need your support. With us, everyone can and should participate. Currently Mineralienatlas is used and expanded by 10455 members. Every month hundreds of thousands of visitors use our website as an information source.
 
Geolitho Foundation non-profit GmbH
Geolitho Foundation non-profit GmbH is the non-profit supporter of the Mineral Atlas (Mineralienatlas), the Lithotheque, the Geolitho Collection Management and the Marketplace and Store by collectors for collectors. The Foundation promotes public education in the field of mineralogy, geology, paleontology and mining by operating, maintaining and further expanding earth science projects.
 
https://www.juwelo.de
https://www.mineraliengrosshandel.com
https://vfmg.de/der-aufschluss/
https://www.mineral-bosse.de
https://fossilsworldwide.de/
https://edelsteintage-bremen.de
 
... Erst knapp 50 Jahre später lie­gen wied­er Nachricht­en vor, und zwar Abrech­nun­gen aus den Jahren 1782 bis 1791. Die da­ma­li­gen Pächter waren die Krett­nich­er Ein­woh­n­er Ni­co­laus Wie­sen, Mat­thias Fin­k­ler und Jo­hann Bathis, Er­ster­er hatte in den 10 Jahren 346 Rtl., der zweite 95 Rtl. und der let­zte 146 ... more... Erst knapp 50 Jahre später liegen wieder Nachrichten vor, und zwar Abrechnungen aus den Jahren 1782 bis 1791. Die damaligen Pächter waren die Krettnicher Einwohner Nicolaus Wiesen, Matthias Finkler und Johann Bathis, Ersterer hatte in den 10 Jahren 346 Rtl., der zweite 95 Rtl. und der letzte 146 Rtl. eingenommen. Hauptabnehmer waren Johannes Scherer in Scheuern, Pastor Anhäuser in Lockweiler, sowie Johannes Bördeler (Birtel) in Krettnich, die offenbar das abgenommene Erz auf eigene Rechnung weitervertrieben. Als Bergmann war damals Paul Jungblut ... Ein Bericht von Berthold Stein
appetizer image
Min­er­al por­trait gar­netThis portrait mainly deals with the 6 classic garnets, their amazing history, the world’s best known classic and modern localities and deposits and their use as a gems or abrasives. It also deals with the common belief related to the non-existence of blue garnets and its refutation proven by new finds. A separate chapter deals with synthetic garnets. But it also deals with the mix up of definitions, groupings and old and unnecessary terms, which have finally been terminated or brought to a common denominator.

In 2012 the IMA (CNMNC) has defined garnets as members of the Garnet Supergroup, which include all minerals isostructural with garnet regardless of what elements occupy the four atomic sites; i.e. the supergroup includes several chemical classes . Those minerals are closely related to each other and may form a series with each other. Some garnets form intermediary minerals between each member, and may even be intergrown within a single crystal.

With the publication of the new nomenclature of the garnet supergroup, the term “garnet group” does not have its meaning anymore and the intermediate working term “Garnet superstructural group” has been replaced by “Garnet Supergroup”.
There are 32 approved species and 5 “candidate” species waiting on approval. The 32 species are subdivided by their Z-charge into 29 species, which belong to 5 groups and to 3 single representative species.
One of those 5 groups is the “Garnet group”, consisting of the 6 former (classic) garnets Pyrope, Grossular, Spessartine, Almandine, Uvarovite and Andradite plus 8 rarer garnets , as Menzerite-(Y), Eringaite, Goldmanite, Momoiite, Knorringite, Calderite, Majorite and Morimotoite.
This por­trait main­ly deals with the 6 clas­sic gar­nets, their amaz­ing his­to­ry, the world’s best known clas­sic and mod­ern lo­cal­i­ties and de­posits and their use as a gems or abra­sives. It al­so deals with the com­mon be­lief re­lat­ed to the non-ex­is­tence of blue gar­nets and its refu­ta­tion proven by new ... moreThis portrait mainly deals with the 6 classic garnets, their amazing history, the world’s best known classic and modern localities and deposits and their use as a gems or abrasives. It also deals with the common belief related to the non-existence of blue garnets and its refutation proven by new finds. A separate chapter deals with synthetic garnets. But it also deals with the mix up of definitions, groupings and old and unnecessary terms, which have finally been terminated or brought to a common denominator.

In 2012 the IMA (CNMNC) has defined garnets as members of the Garnet Supergroup, which include all minerals isostructural with garnet regardless of what elements occupy the four atomic sites; i.e. the supergroup includes several chemical classes . Those minerals are closely related to each other and may form a series with each other. Some garnets form intermediary minerals between each member, and may even be intergrown within a single crystal.

With the publication of the new nomenclature of the garnet supergroup, the term “garnet group” does not have its meaning anymore and the intermediate working term “Garnet superstructural group” has been replaced by “Garnet Supergroup”.
There are 32 approved species and 5 “candidate” species waiting on approval. The 32 species are subdivided by their Z-charge into 29 species, which belong to 5 groups and to 3 single representative species.
One of those 5 groups is the “Garnet group”, consisting of the 6 former (classic) garnets Pyrope, Grossular, Spessartine, Almandine, Uvarovite and Andradite plus 8 rarer garnets , as Menzerite-(Y), Eringaite, Goldmanite, Momoiite, Knorringite, Calderite, Majorite and Morimotoite.
appetizer image
Als Bes­tim­mungs­merk­mal fall­en zwei­far­bige Ein­sprenglinge (blau­grau und rosarot) auf, die allerd­ings auch in der Variante RP26 vorkom­men. Das wichtig­ste Kri­teri­um, um diese bei­den Varian­ten au­sei­nan­der hal­ten zu kön­nen, sind die in der in­tru­siv­en Variante vorhan­de­nen, sch­malen Zonierun­gen, welche die ... moreAls Bestimmungsmerkmal fallen zweifarbige Einsprenglinge (blaugrau und rosarot) auf, die allerdings auch in der Variante RP26 vorkommen. Das wichtigste Kriterium, um diese beiden Varianten auseinander halten zu können, sind die in der intrusiven Variante vorhandenen, schmalen Zonierungen, welche die blaugrauen Kristalle dünn umschließen. Generell finden sich 2 Arten von Einsprenglingen in der intrusiven Variante: 1. kleine, zerbrochen wirkende rosarote und 2. größere, blaugraue mit schmaler Zonierung, welche die gleiche Farbe aufweist, wie die der Kleineren Einsprenglinge. ... Ein Beitrag von Jörg-Florian J.
appetizer image
 
https://www.lithomania.de
https://www.chiemgauer-mineralien-fossiliensammler.de/
https://www.mineralbox.biz
https://crystalparadise.de/
Die 63. Rhein-Neckar-Mineralienbörse in Walldorf
https://www.phillisverlag.de/Kalender-Shop/Mineralienkalender/