Mineralienatlas (name for mineral atlas) is the platform for people interested in mineralogy, geology, palaeontology and mining since 2001. We operate a significant database for minerals, fossils, rocks and their localities. Mineralienatlas is not limited to a section. We bring together information and inform comprehensive.

To complete our information constantly, we need your support. With us, everyone can and should participate. Currently Mineralienatlas is used and expanded by 10531 members. Every month hundreds of thousands of visitors use our website as an information source.
 
Geolitho Foundation non-profit GmbH
Geolitho Foundation non-profit GmbH is the non-profit supporter of the Mineral Atlas (Mineralienatlas), the Lithotheque, the Geolitho Collection Management and the Marketplace and Store by collectors for collectors. The Foundation promotes public education in the field of mineralogy, geology, paleontology and mining by operating, maintaining and further expanding earth science projects.
 
https://vfmg.de/der-aufschluss/
https://www.edelsteine-neuburg.de
https://www.juwelo.de
https://www.lithomania.de
https://www.chiemgauer-mineralien-fossiliensammler.de/
https://www.mineralbox.biz
 
... Für die hi­er vorgestellte Un­ter­suchung wur­den Spek­tren von Urano­phan, Sk­lo­dowsk­it und Urano­circ­it aus der Lit­er­a­tur herange­zo­gen. Bei den un­ter­sucht­en Min­er­alien wurde näm­lich fest­gestellt, dass auf dem gleichen Stück auftre­tende, an­dere Uranyl-Min­er­alien, die Mes­sung ver­fälschen kön­nen, wenn de ... more... Für die hier vorgestellte Untersuchung wurden Spektren von Uranophan, Sklodowskit und Uranocircit aus der Literatur herangezogen. Bei den untersuchten Mineralien wurde nämlich festgestellt, dass auf dem gleichen Stück auftretende, andere Uranyl-Mineralien, die Messung verfälschen können, wenn deren Lumineszenz nicht räumlich sicher abgeblockt werden kann. Beispielsweise beeinflusste in einer ersten Messung die vergleichsweise starke Lumineszenz von Uranocircit die Messung an einer Uranophan-Probe aus Menzenschwand. Aus diesem Grund ist es sinnvoll, die Spektren weiterer potentiell auftretender Mineralien wie Uranocircit mit in die Untersuchung aufzunehmen, um bei der Bestimmung der Mineralien solche Einflüsse aufspüren zu können... Ein Beitrag von Markus Noller und Martin Stark
appetizer image
Seit dem Al­ter­tum ist Smaragd auf­grund sein­er Schön­heit und sein­er ungewöhn­lich leb­haft grü­nen Farbe als Edel­stein begehrt. Je­doch - nach dem Spruch "Es ist nicht alles Gold, was glänzt" - sind nicht alle "Edel­steine" mit dies­er at­trak­tiv­en Farbe auch tat­säch­lich Smaragd gewe­sen. In der Geschichte f ... moreSeit dem Altertum ist Smaragd aufgrund seiner Schönheit und seiner ungewöhnlich lebhaft grünen Farbe als Edelstein begehrt. Jedoch - nach dem Spruch "Es ist nicht alles Gold, was glänzt" - sind nicht alle "Edelsteine" mit dieser attraktiven Farbe auch tatsächlich Smaragd gewesen. In der Geschichte finden sich dafür zahlreiche Beispiele. Immer wieder wurden neu entdeckte Mineralien, die mit bekannten und als Edelstein geschätzten Steinen in Farbe und Charakteristika übereinstimmten, fälschlich als echt gehandelt und verarbeitet. Eines dieser Mineralien, welches wegen seiner Farbe sehr lange als Smaragd galt, ist Dioptas. Ein Mineralienportrait geschrieben von Peter Seroka.
appetizer image
In­di­ca­tor stoneA Scandinavian indicator stone is a glacial erratic composed of a characteristic rock type derived from a small known source area in Scandinavia. This term not only applies to igneous and metamorphic rocks but also to some sedimentary rocks. The Jotnian Sandstone and most of the Palaeozoic limestones, and the Old Red Sandstone are not included in the definition, although the presence of these and other rocks provide some evidence about the source area(s) of erratics and should certainly not be neglected in a stone count. In all cases we recommend including the whole assemblage of erratics/stones in such account. This makes it possible to use several methods of Interpretation. However, it should be pointed out that the practise used in the past, whereby each researcher had her/his own method of interpreting stone counts, has proved to be unsatisfactory. We demonstrate on the bases of over 2000 counts of indicator stones that we have carried out on assemblages mostly from Lower Saxony and Schleswig-Holstein, but also from other N.German states and neighbouring countries, that the TGZ method (LÜTTIG 1958) yields the most reliable results. In addition to this method, the sources of individual indicator stones may be plotted on a so-called circle map and can be integrated with possible source data and the relative frequencies of other erratics in the assemblage. Some rock types are more suitable as indicator stones then others. It is unwise to use clearly unsuitable rock types; this would considerably reduce the reliability of the method and lead to erroneous results.
A Scan­di­na­vian in­di­ca­tor stone is a gla­cial er­rat­ic com­posed of a char­ac­teris­tic rock type de­rived from a small known source area in Scan­di­navia. This term not on­ly ap­plies to ig­neous and me­ta­mor­ph­ic rocks but al­so to some sed­i­men­tary rocks. The Jot­nian Sand­s­tone and most of the Palaeo­zoic lime­s­tone ... moreA Scandinavian indicator stone is a glacial erratic composed of a characteristic rock type derived from a small known source area in Scandinavia. This term not only applies to igneous and metamorphic rocks but also to some sedimentary rocks. The Jotnian Sandstone and most of the Palaeozoic limestones, and the Old Red Sandstone are not included in the definition, although the presence of these and other rocks provide some evidence about the source area(s) of erratics and should certainly not be neglected in a stone count. In all cases we recommend including the whole assemblage of erratics/stones in such account. This makes it possible to use several methods of Interpretation. However, it should be pointed out that the practise used in the past, whereby each researcher had her/his own method of interpreting stone counts, has proved to be unsatisfactory. We demonstrate on the bases of over 2000 counts of indicator stones that we have carried out on assemblages mostly from Lower Saxony and Schleswig-Holstein, but also from other N.German states and neighbouring countries, that the TGZ method (LÜTTIG 1958) yields the most reliable results. In addition to this method, the sources of individual indicator stones may be plotted on a so-called circle map and can be integrated with possible source data and the relative frequencies of other erratics in the assemblage. Some rock types are more suitable as indicator stones then others. It is unwise to use clearly unsuitable rock types; this would considerably reduce the reliability of the method and lead to erroneous results.
appetizer image
 
https://www.mineral-bosse.de
https://fossilsworldwide.de/
Mineralien Kalender
Edelsteintage Konstanz
hausen - Mineraliengrosshandel.com
https://crystalparadise.de/