Mineralienatlas (name for mineral atlas) is the platform for people interested in mineralogy, geology, palaeontology and mining since 2001. We operate a significant database for minerals, fossils, rocks and their localities. Mineralienatlas is not limited to a section. We bring together information and inform comprehensive.

To complete our information constantly, we need your support. With us, everyone can and should participate. Currently Mineralienatlas is used and expanded by 10586 members. Every month hundreds of thousands of visitors use our website as an information source.
 
Geolitho Foundation non-profit GmbH
Geolitho Foundation non-profit GmbH is the non-profit supporter of the Mineral Atlas (Mineralienatlas), the Lithotheque, the Geolitho Collection Management and the Marketplace and Store by collectors for collectors. The Foundation promotes public education in the field of mineralogy, geology, paleontology and mining by operating, maintaining and further expanding earth science projects.
 
https://crystalparadise.de/
https://fossilsworldwide.de/
https://www.mineral-bosse.de
Edelsteintage Konstanz
https://www.lithomania.de
hausen - Mineraliengrosshandel.com
 
Ei­nen er­sten wichti­gen Schritt zur Ent­ste­hung des Variszischen Ge­birges stellte bere­its der Zer­fall des Su­perkonti­nents Ro­di­nia in mehrere Großkonti­nente im späten Neo­pro­tero­zoikum vor et­wa 750 Ma dar. Paläo­geo­graphische Un­ter­suchun­gen lassen da­rauf sch­ließen, dass sich im Ver­lauf der fol­gen­den 100 ... moreEinen ersten wichtigen Schritt zur Entstehung des Variszischen Gebirges stellte bereits der Zerfall des Superkontinents Rodinia in mehrere Großkontinente im späten Neoproterozoikum vor etwa 750 Ma dar. Paläogeographische Untersuchungen lassen darauf schließen, dass sich im Verlauf der folgenden 100 Ma zuerst Laurentia, Baltica (Osteuropäischer Kraton) und Sibirien, später auch eine Reihe kleinerer Terrane wie Avalonia und Armorica von Gondwana lösten und nach Norden drifteten. Zwischen diesen Kontinentplatten kam es zur Entstehung großer Ozeanbecken: dem Iapetus zwischen Laurentia und Baltica, dem Tornquist-Ozean zwischen Baltica und Avalonia und dem Rheischen Ozean. Auch Armorica war wahrscheinlich durch einen schmalen Ozean von Gondwana abgetrennt.
appetizer image
Die "Le­bach­er Ei­er" ent­s­tan­den vor et­wa 250 bis 280 Mil­lio­nen Jahren zur Zeit des Perm. Im Ge­bi­et des heuti­gen Ortes Le­bach im Saar­land bis nach Bad Kreuz­nach er­streckte sich ein weit ausgedeh­n­ter Bin­nensee, der eine Fläche be­deckte, die unge­fähr drei­mal so groß wie der Bo­densee gewe­sen sein dürfte. ... moreDie "Lebacher Eier" entstanden vor etwa 250 bis 280 Millionen Jahren zur Zeit des Perm. Im Gebiet des heutigen Ortes Lebach im Saarland bis nach Bad Kreuznach erstreckte sich ein weit ausgedehnter Binnensee, der eine Fläche bedeckte, die ungefähr dreimal so groß wie der Bodensee gewesen sein dürfte.

In diesem nicht so flachen See, der durch verzweigte Flusssysteme gespeißt wurde, selbst jedoch keinen größeren Strömungen unterworfen war, fand sich eine gut, durch Funde belegte, Flora und Fauna. Das Klima war nicht mehr so tropisch wie während der vorangegangenen Karbon-Zeit, sondern trockener. Das wiederum führte zur Bildung von lokalen Biotopen, wie sie hier in Form dieses Seebeckens vorlagen.
appetizer image
In­di­ca­tor stoneA Scandinavian indicator stone is a glacial erratic composed of a characteristic rock type derived from a small known source area in Scandinavia. This term not only applies to igneous and metamorphic rocks but also to some sedimentary rocks. The Jotnian Sandstone and most of the Palaeozoic limestones, and the Old Red Sandstone are not included in the definition, although the presence of these and other rocks provide some evidence about the source area(s) of erratics and should certainly not be neglected in a stone count. In all cases we recommend including the whole assemblage of erratics/stones in such account. This makes it possible to use several methods of Interpretation. However, it should be pointed out that the practise used in the past, whereby each researcher had her/his own method of interpreting stone counts, has proved to be unsatisfactory. We demonstrate on the bases of over 2000 counts of indicator stones that we have carried out on assemblages mostly from Lower Saxony and Schleswig-Holstein, but also from other N.German states and neighbouring countries, that the TGZ method (LÜTTIG 1958) yields the most reliable results. In addition to this method, the sources of individual indicator stones may be plotted on a so-called circle map and can be integrated with possible source data and the relative frequencies of other erratics in the assemblage. Some rock types are more suitable as indicator stones then others. It is unwise to use clearly unsuitable rock types; this would considerably reduce the reliability of the method and lead to erroneous results.
A Scan­di­na­vian in­di­ca­tor stone is a gla­cial er­rat­ic com­posed of a char­ac­teris­tic rock type de­rived from a small known source area in Scan­di­navia. This term not on­ly ap­plies to ig­neous and me­ta­mor­ph­ic rocks but al­so to some sed­i­men­tary rocks. The Jot­nian Sand­s­tone and most of the Palaeo­zoic lime­s­tone ... moreA Scandinavian indicator stone is a glacial erratic composed of a characteristic rock type derived from a small known source area in Scandinavia. This term not only applies to igneous and metamorphic rocks but also to some sedimentary rocks. The Jotnian Sandstone and most of the Palaeozoic limestones, and the Old Red Sandstone are not included in the definition, although the presence of these and other rocks provide some evidence about the source area(s) of erratics and should certainly not be neglected in a stone count. In all cases we recommend including the whole assemblage of erratics/stones in such account. This makes it possible to use several methods of Interpretation. However, it should be pointed out that the practise used in the past, whereby each researcher had her/his own method of interpreting stone counts, has proved to be unsatisfactory. We demonstrate on the bases of over 2000 counts of indicator stones that we have carried out on assemblages mostly from Lower Saxony and Schleswig-Holstein, but also from other N.German states and neighbouring countries, that the TGZ method (LÜTTIG 1958) yields the most reliable results. In addition to this method, the sources of individual indicator stones may be plotted on a so-called circle map and can be integrated with possible source data and the relative frequencies of other erratics in the assemblage. Some rock types are more suitable as indicator stones then others. It is unwise to use clearly unsuitable rock types; this would considerably reduce the reliability of the method and lead to erroneous results.
appetizer image
 
https://www.juwelo.de
https://www.edelsteine-neuburg.de
https://vfmg.de/der-aufschluss/
https://www.mineralbox.biz
https://www.chiemgauer-mineralien-fossiliensammler.de/
Mineralien Kalender